Perspective-taking Essay

fast one, 12 years old, sits anxiously on his desk, waiting for Ms Terror to hand him the result of his math footraceify. With hands in fervid prayer, he closes his eyes as Ms Terror lays the shield write up on his table. A big red F screams to him the moment he opened his eyes. He has expected that grade because instead of fall overing for the test, he fagged the night playing internet games with Aaron. His dilemma how fucking he realize a good grade in next Fridays exam when Aaron is inviting him to play again? According to Magnus Linklater (2007), peer groups are a barbarians biggest influencers.This is undeniable as children believe their peers are the yet ones who can understand them. only if adults should non underestimate their problem solving abilities as they have a unique way of getting things done and answering their personal needs. Looking into Piagets cognitive culture, we see that magic has practiced entered the formal operational stage, wherein he d evelops the ability to think about purloin concepts and discovers skills such as logical thought, deductive reasoning, and systematic computer programning (Van Wagner, 2007).With logic, bottom chooses to study not only for his coming math test and also for all his other tests and sets aside internet games until weekend. He knows that doing so, he will get more than just a passing grade, and so no more terror looks from Ms Terror as intumesce as unsolicited talks with mom and Dad. Moreover, thinking abstractly, instead of relying on past experiences, rear considers the possible consequences of agreeing to Aarons invitation. He would be reprimanded by Ms Terror or worse, she would call the attention of his parents.In addition, derriere chooses not to rely on trial-and-error methods of doing things, as he did when he was younger or in earlier stages of Piagets cognitive discipline (Van Wagner, 2007). He now has the ability to solve his dilemma in a systematic manner, thus he quickly comes up with a plan for him not to get another dreaded F. He reads his lessons few geezerhood before the test so he can play games with Aaron in his free time or review his lesson the night before the test and just play on weekends, whichever way he is comfortable with.But Johns interaction with his peers, Aaron in particular, should not be discouraged, as Piaget pointed out that a childs peer interaction is not just a major source of his or her cognitive development but his or her social development as well, specifically in role-taking and empathy (cited in Oden, 1987). John regards Aaron as his best friend, thus sustaining their friendship allows John to know his proclaim self and his range of social interaction skills. Furthermore, since the cardinal boys have passed the stage wherein they share just physical activities like childhood games, and they are now capable of sharing materials, being kind or helpful (Oden, 1987), and perceiving their friendship as supporti ng individuality and mutuality, John every invites Aaron to review their lessons together before playing games or asks Aaron to postpone their untenanted activity until the test is done so that each can review on his own and eventually perform better in the test.The theory of moral development by psychologist Kohlberg, who drew inspiration from Piagets cognitive development, can also help answer Johns dilemma. John takes into consideration the expectations of his family, as he tries to maintain, support, and justify that studying hard for the test is the right thing to do, in accordance to the conventional level of Kohlbergs theory. Specifically, he resorts to being a good boy by reviewing for the test because he knows that doing so will please Ms Terror and Mom and Dad.Johns behavior is judged by his intention, which is both good and all-important(prenominal) since he means well (Kohlberg, 1971) for himself, for Ms Terror, for Mom and Dad, and even for caller at large. John cou ld solve his dilemma in various perspectives, which at present or indirectly take its root from Piagets cognitive theory. This only shows that students like John can solve their own dilemmas in their own respective ways. It is normal for them to falter and make mistakes because through these, they get to learn, grow, and develop. Now, John sits comfortably on his desk, excited to see his grade on the math test. B it reads.