Language And Literature Essay

Analyze, compare and distinguish the follo aviate two text editions. Include comments on the analogousities and differences between the texts and the signifi behindce of context, purpose, audience, and formal and stylistic features.Cranes by Jennifer Ackerman, and To a water damn by William Cullen Bryant, both aim to enlighten and educate their readers on the look and beauty of waterbird. Text 1, Cranes, an term from National Geographic from 2004, demonstrates how great deal can help birds discover their migration patterns, while in contrast Text 2, To a Waterfowl, a poem written in 1815, illustrates how birds can aid people in the search for inspiration.Ultimately both, Cranes and To a Waterfowl focus on these specific birds with the intention of promoting the appreciation and understanding towards nature. This comparative commentary will aim to identify and investigate the similarities and differences between the two texts, through the digest of the significance of the con text, audience, purpose, and formal and stylistic features.Cranes, a journalistic condition effected for National Geographic, explores the habitation of a community of hold outs. The condition provees the operations of the rude(a) crane reserve, where the endangered species are monitored during their growth in a pretense of a natural environment, where graciouss in crane costumes examine their development. The article further demonstrates its journalistic characteristics when it quotes crane biologist Richard Urbanek, who explains, these chicks have been raised in captivity but have never heard a human voice nor seen a human form, except in crane costume.Fundamentally, the article demonstrates the experimental program to reintroduce a wild migratory universe of whooping cranes to the eastern half of North America, and the process involved in stint their goal. In contrast, To a Waterfowl explores the narrators personal stick and response to an encounter with a waterfowl.The poem demonstrates a narrative, which illustrates a cranes flight and its struggle to escape the hunter and its demise, which results in the one-on-one establishing an internal reflection, which ultimately reveals the virtuousity that William Bryant wanted to convey. The didactic poem creates a natural scene in order to derive a moral lesson from it, which I call up, very romantically, that no matter how circumstances present themselves in life, you will be directed by the providence of God, or a higher Power.Though fundamentally, Cranes and To a Waterfowl both discuss and explore experiences relating to cranes, they possess assorted purposes, which essentially results in them possessing different bum audiences as well. To a Waterfowls main purpose is to state the central moral teaching regarding Gods benevolent providence. The waterfowl acts as an allegory to express this theme within the poem. Referring to the poem allegorically, the waterfowl may represent human struggles t hat we face throughout life, while the birds adversary, the hunter, represents the pursuing threats that we constantly face in life.I believe that the poem is targeted towards a more mature audience due to its thematic complexity and seriousness. In contrast to this, Cranes purpose is to inform and educate the readers on the modern techniques pioneered by Operation Migration, and their mission to help endangered birds chequer their traditional migratory routes. Therefore, I believe that this National Geographic articles intended audience are individuals who are interested or concerned about the preservation of endangered animals, and in this example, specifically cranes.A significant difference between the two texts exists in their structures. Cranes is presented as an article, and demonstrates galore(postnominal) of the formats characteristics. Visually, it possesses two images, in order to compliment the text and attract the readers attention to the article, and is structured in paragraphs. In terms of context and language, the article demonstrates many examples of factual information, supported by evidence, rather then expressing opinionated points. For example, referencing crane biologist Richard Urbanek. In contrast to this, To a Waterfowl illustrates numerous examples of standard characteristics of a poem. Bryant divides the poem into eighter stanzas, each with the same metrical structure and each with the same verse line pattern.Although both texts are written in different formants and demonstrate different structures, both texts exemplify the rehearse of descriptive imagery in their use of language in order to enhance the description the writers are severe to illustrate.For example, in the poem, the writer describes the surroundings by saying, weedy lake, rocking billows, and crimson riff, while in the article Cranes, the first paragraph has examples such as emerald green grass, snow-white plumage and elegant black wing tips that spread like fi ngers when they fly. Furthermore, in contrast to the article, the poem utilizes allusions towards the Bible, by mentioning heaven, and utilizing biblical language such as thou art bygone.Conclusively, both texts, Cranes by Jennifer Ackerman, and To a Waterfowl by William Cullen Bryant demonstrate numerous contrasts in their use of language, purpose, audience and stylistic features, however, both are similar in their aim to communicate the significance of crane migrations, scientifically, and emotionally.