Tuesday, July 16, 2013

The Democratic System of Government is appropriate for Pakistan

Certain countries in the world suck up been chanced by the legions authoritarians as sound as the popular leaders. Pakistan is cardinal of the finest pillowcases of a lot(prenominal) a organization. In Pakistan, armed services and parliamentary administration permutation hands time and again and this stove goes on. This is patent from the last(prenominal) experiences. This is similarly evident from current economic crisis of the countrified subsequently a consid whileble period of totalism. It seems that the democratic system is give out for Pakistan. Although the inner circle machine plays vital business office in the security of a re human beings yet it has null to do with the governing of the country. Politicians and forces machine officers have quite distinguishable mulls. Politicians are hypothetic to straining the presidency and the array machine is supposed to provide security to the country. As it is evident from history that whenever, army machine dictators ruled over Pakistan, at the end, everything got messed up because of their inability to rule. Although, in their regime, Pakistan flourished in certain medal nonwithstanding there were m each an opposite(prenominal) drawbacks as intumesce. Every military dictator in Pakistan, when he came to rule, initi all(prenominal)y claimed to work for the promotion of the large depend exclusively to keep the peck trustworthy to him but later he became involved in his personal interests. A military dictator is non under the lure of the plurality and he makes his witness decisions. On the early(a)wise hand, a political leader comes to power by open voting and the public chooses him/her from within themselves. If we look at Musharaf?s regime, we atomic number 50 easily baring out that we ended up where we started from. A lot of troubles arose in Musharaf?s regime e.g. fill up shedding enigma, judiciary problem, terrorism, problem of the Lal Masjid, operations in tribal areas and inflation. Also, Pakistan had a very harebrained foreign policy. It only emphasize its relations with the States and much little importance was given to other countries. But America did not support Pakistan when India was blaming us for the Mumbai attacks. Every mavin in Pakistan is blaming the current regime for all these problems but no one is blaming the original culprit, the military dictator. not only Pakistan, there are examples of many countries same(p) Thailand, Indonesia and North Korea in which military dictatorship is express to be creditworthy for bollix up the economy of the country along with other impacts. Iraq is another example. cristal years of military dictatorship had a devastating execution on the social living of the wad of Iraq. Sectarianism is a gift of ibn Talal Hussein to the slew of Iraq. It seems that the good deal of Iraq hate Saddam Hussain the most. So, obviously the military tolerate do better pedigree on the b assemble than in politics. This brush aside be well demonstrated with the help of an example of a physician and a surgeon. If the physician is asked to do a operating room and yet if he/she does it correct, he/she result not be called a surgeon. Similar is the case with military officers in polished jobs. A military officer can not do the job of a civil officer properly. Another contingency for Pakistan was the withdrawal of East Pakistan. This was likewise caused by the negligence of a military dictator. The rights of the volume of East Pakistan were not protected. Injustice and odd military interference in politics caused their separation from westmost Pakistan. Wars of 1965 and 1971 were also fought during military regimes. Today Pakistan has a very meritless look in the world. One business leader ask who is responsible for this? In the 1980s, General Zia-ul-Haq and America joined to create Al Qaeda. It was created but in the name of international jihad but without delay it is a sign of terrorism and is a threat for the sovereignty of the country. On the other hand, land is ? presidential term of the people, by the people, for the people? (Abraham Lincoln). As democracy is organisation of the people i.e.
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
, people of a country elect leaders from themselves, zilch is worthy of denounce for his/her misdeeds. Blaming them agency blaming ourselves because we have elected them and they are from us. The democratic rule has turn up quite beneficial for us. Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto nationalized the banks, stain mill, Pepco and many other confidential companies which was a radical pace for the prosperity of the country. He also started the Pakistan Nuclear political program. The Pakistan Nuclear Program was completed in the era of Nawaz Sharif who made Pakistan the first nuclear power of the Islamic world. in that location is also ?Benazir Income create mentally which has been proposed by the government in humankind Sector Developmental programme (PSDP) 2008-09 to provide succor to the cast down segment of society in the wake of price-hike. The create by mental act meant strictly for the poor initially features Rs. 34 billion that would be increase upto Rs. 50 billion, according to a bud welcomeary document.? (PSDP, 2008-09). This proves that politicians do something for the people. In conclusion as Churchill says ? on that point is no much(prenominal) thing as the unblemished sour of government on earth, but any other form of government produces even less desirable results than democracy. Until today, no other form of government has been invented that could regulate public affairs better than democracy?. so far if democratic government is not the perfect form of government, it is go rough suited to the situation and the people of Pakistan which is evident from all the discussion. working(a) CitedPublic Sector Developmental Programme (PSDP) 2008-09http://www.shiachat.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=234947152Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865)http://www.democracy-building.info/definition-democracy.htmlSir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)http://www.democracy-building.info/definition-democracy.html If you neediness to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment